Examqo

Examqo › Examqo library › Oncology › Head and neck and thyroid · IMLE

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

Early head and neck cancer is treated with a single modality — surgery or radiation — and locally advanced cancer with a combination: surgery with adjuvant radiation, or chemoradiation with cisplatin; HPV in the oropharynx improves prognosis and changes the stage.

Why it matters in the exam

Head and neck questions appear in the radiation part of the exam every year. They ask about the treatment of an early glottic tumour in a hoarse smoker, when to add cisplatin to radiation after surgery, the benefit of hyperfractionation, and the meaning of HPV as a predictive and prognostic marker in oropharyngeal tumours.

Common distractors are replacing cisplatin with cetuximab in a cisplatin-fit patient, forgetting dental care before radiation, or choosing larynx preservation in a T4a tumour that has destroyed cartilage. Late radiation effects are also asked — dry mouth, osteoradionecrosis of the jaw, hypothyroidism and carotid stenosis.

Key points

Summary table

SituationTreatmentExam detail
Early glottic tumour (T1–T2 N0)Radiation alone or transoral laser resectionHigh cure rates; the glottis has little lymphatic drainage so nodes are not irradiated
Resectable locally advancedSurgery with adjuvant radiationPositive margins or extranodal extension — adjuvant chemoradiation with cisplatin
Unresectable locally advanced or for organ preservationChemoradiation 70 Gy in 35 fractions with cisplatinCisplatin 100 mg/m² every 3 weeks or a weekly dose; larynx preservation — concurrent chemoradiation is best
T4a laryngeal tumour with cartilage destructionTotal laryngectomy followed by radiationLarynx preservation is not suitable
Unfit for cisplatinRadiation alone, or radiation with cetuximabIn HPV-positive oropharyngeal tumours cetuximab is inferior to cisplatin
Recurrence or metastasesPembrolizumab alone or with platinum and 5-FU, by CPSCPS of 1 or more — pembrolizumab alone is possible
HyperfractionationMore, smaller fractions per dayBetter regional control and survival than conventional fractionation

A free exam question

חולה בת 45 ,עם מלנומה של הקרקפת .ללא גרורות עברה כריתה מקומית ודיסקציה צווארית, בה נראו שתי בלוטות מעורבות בפרוטיד האם יש מקום ל המליץ ?על קרינה משלימה ומדוע. (the question as examined, in Hebrew)

  1. א. לא , .בהעדר מעורבות שוליים אין אינדיקציה לטיפול קרינתי
  2. ב. לא היתרון לקרינה משלימה נראה במעורבות של 3 .בלוטות ויותר
  3. ג. כן, יש יתרון לקרינה משלימה ב מלנומה ממקור ראש- .צוואר
  4. ד. כן, יש יתרון לקרינ ה משלימה בהישרדות בקבוצת הגיל מתחת ל- 50

See the answer and explanation

In the full version for subscribers

The full version is open to subscribers of: Oncology, ENT and head and neck surgery, Medical licensing exam (IMLE).

Subscriber? Read the full topic Plans and prices 25 free questions

Sources

Sources are given for further reading; the text is written afresh and not copied from them.

Reviewed by the Examqo AI Professor · 2026-11-06. The text may contain errors; when in doubt, check the source.